-
论坛网址：https://db2.mom（可微信分享）、https://0668.es、https://0668.cc（全加密访问）
俄罗斯：解放军外购导弹已交货 数量巨大 (4人在浏览)
- 主题发起人 歌功颂德
- 开始时间
http://www.stnn.cc/fin/200902/t20090210_975959.html
【星岛网讯】美国政府为保护失业劳工避免陷入经济困境所架设的安全网出现重大漏洞！美国劳工部上周五公布的1月份失业率飙至7.6%，可在高达1160万的失业人口中，竟有将近半数未能获得失业救济金的奥援。
《工商时报》报道指出，社会救济安全网出现漏洞，约有520万丢掉饭碗的美国人未获得补助，越来越多失业劳工领不到救济金，只好勒紧裤腰带缩减支出，如此恐加剧美国经济的衰退程度。这种现象印证经济专家所言，这套始于1930年代经济大萧条时期的救济方案已经不合时宜，有必要大刀阔斧改革以符合21世纪的需要。
现行的失业救济制度之所以不敷当前所需，主要的症结在于这套制度1935年问世当时，完全针对全职工作者的需要设计，但目前从事兼职工作的人数，已远超过1935年当时。
此外，许多符合救济资格的失业劳工，申请补助金却吃了闭门羹，是因为州政府采用过时落伍的系统计算收入，拉高他们的申请门坎增加困难度。另外就是失业持续时间越来越长，以非当初的26周失业补助时限所能应付。
目前正在参院审议等候闯关的逾8000亿美元振兴经济方案，当中的270亿美元即被规划用于扩大失业救济，尽管补助规模因各州而异，但平均每人每周可领取300美元。
根据联邦政府资助的“全国受雇者法律计划（National Employment Law Project）”组织，这项最新扩大失业救济方案一旦实施，到今年底前约有300万美国人受惠。
【星岛网讯】美国政府为保护失业劳工避免陷入经济困境所架设的安全网出现重大漏洞！美国劳工部上周五公布的1月份失业率飙至7.6%，可在高达1160万的失业人口中，竟有将近半数未能获得失业救济金的奥援。
《工商时报》报道指出，社会救济安全网出现漏洞，约有520万丢掉饭碗的美国人未获得补助，越来越多失业劳工领不到救济金，只好勒紧裤腰带缩减支出，如此恐加剧美国经济的衰退程度。这种现象印证经济专家所言，这套始于1930年代经济大萧条时期的救济方案已经不合时宜，有必要大刀阔斧改革以符合21世纪的需要。
现行的失业救济制度之所以不敷当前所需，主要的症结在于这套制度1935年问世当时，完全针对全职工作者的需要设计，但目前从事兼职工作的人数，已远超过1935年当时。
此外，许多符合救济资格的失业劳工，申请补助金却吃了闭门羹，是因为州政府采用过时落伍的系统计算收入，拉高他们的申请门坎增加困难度。另外就是失业持续时间越来越长，以非当初的26周失业补助时限所能应付。
目前正在参院审议等候闯关的逾8000亿美元振兴经济方案，当中的270亿美元即被规划用于扩大失业救济，尽管补助规模因各州而异，但平均每人每周可领取300美元。
根据联邦政府资助的“全国受雇者法律计划（National Employment Law Project）”组织，这项最新扩大失业救济方案一旦实施，到今年底前约有300万美国人受惠。
QUOTE(prototype @ 2010年04月01日 Thursday, 12:26 AM)
又来个没常识的。
CIA figures for the latest world unemployment rates Unemployment occurs when a person is available and willing to work but currently without work
失业率是指想工作、有能力工作而不能的。美国农民不想工作，就不会给CIA统计进去。
中国广东农村人在家待业的总人数你数过了？还是CIA告诉你：中国人的数字我们造了假？
中国的只是统计城镇失业率。
温总理：“我知道美国有200万失业人口，这让政府十分焦急，但中国失业人口有2亿。”
美国人口3亿。
中国农村那些年轻人都是没有能力去工作，在中国有多少年轻人不想去工作的呢？
你数过了？
又来个没常识的。
CIA figures for the latest world unemployment rates Unemployment occurs when a person is available and willing to work but currently without work
失业率是指想工作、有能力工作而不能的。美国农民不想工作，就不会给CIA统计进去。
中国广东农村人在家待业的总人数你数过了？还是CIA告诉你：中国人的数字我们造了假？
[snapback]2946831[/snapback]
中国的只是统计城镇失业率。
温总理：“我知道美国有200万失业人口，这让政府十分焦急，但中国失业人口有2亿。”
美国人口3亿。
中国农村那些年轻人都是没有能力去工作，在中国有多少年轻人不想去工作的呢？
你数过了？
QUOTE(牛甲 @ 2010年04月01日 Thursday, 12:33 AM)
中国的只是统计城镇失业率。
温总理：“我知道美国有200万失业人口，这让政府十分焦急，但中国失业人口有2亿。”
美国人口3亿。
这个早就被人戳穿了是记者搞的把戏。新华网刊登的原文是“就业压力有2亿”。
http://view.news.qq.com/a/20100327/000021.htm
笔者对比了各大网站记录的温家宝讲话的措辞，发现还是有微妙的差别。新华网的表述是：“温家宝：中国就业人口的压力是2亿人而不是200万人。”而其他网站多数的表述是：“谈到失业问题时，温家宝总理说，我知道美国有200万失业人口，这让政府十分焦急，但中国失业人口有2亿。”
原文不看，看演义，很好很强大。
中国的只是统计城镇失业率。
温总理：“我知道美国有200万失业人口，这让政府十分焦急，但中国失业人口有2亿。”
美国人口3亿。
[snapback]2946845[/snapback]
这个早就被人戳穿了是记者搞的把戏。新华网刊登的原文是“就业压力有2亿”。
http://view.news.qq.com/a/20100327/000021.htm
笔者对比了各大网站记录的温家宝讲话的措辞，发现还是有微妙的差别。新华网的表述是：“温家宝：中国就业人口的压力是2亿人而不是200万人。”而其他网站多数的表述是：“谈到失业问题时，温家宝总理说，我知道美国有200万失业人口，这让政府十分焦急，但中国失业人口有2亿。”
原文不看，看演义，很好很强大。
QUOTE(牛甲 @ 2010年04月01日 Thursday, 12:43 AM)
说明“人往高处走“
麻烦你拿出“美国统计失业人口把农民都算进去”的证据。然后好好看看这篇文章。
America's Effective Unemployment Rate at 18.7%?
By Steve Clemons - July 2, 2009, 9:55AM
Each month, I receive from Leo Hindery an update on "America's effective unemployment rate" which includes not only the official unemployment figures but other data points showing off-the-books unemployed or underemployed people.
The numbers are staggering and are aggregates of official data. They matter because various Obama administration officials including the President himself started off calling for huge stimulus packages to help generate "jobs, jobs, jobs!"
But now, I have been hearing more and more from senior Obama economic team members about the jobs they hoped for coming at the very tail end of an economic recovery. Others are talking about a GDP recovery -- but not a jobs recovery. They are admitting as well that they underestimated the severity of this recession and its impact on unemployment levels.
And all this while Goldman Sachs and other financial houses have seen their balance sheets get cleaned up and bonuses surge.
Hindery writes:
Here is a June 2009 version of the summary that calculates the Effective Unemployment Rate, which is now 18.70%, and the Effective Number of Unemployed, which is now 30,172,000.
There are currently 14,729,000 officially unemployed workers, as just announced. However, this figure does not include the combined 15,443,000 workers either (1) in the "labor force reserve" because they have abandoned their job searches (i.e., 4,278,000) or (2) underemployed because they are "part-time of necessity" (i.e., 8,989,000) or "otherwise marginally attached" (i.e., 2,176,000).
The effective unemployment rate is therefore 18.70%, instead of the official 9.51%.
Since the start of the recession in December 2007, the number of workers who are officially unemployed has increased by 7,188,000, while almost twice as many workers - 13,290,000 - have become effectively unemployed. And all the while, we should have been creating around 2,250,000 new jobs (i.e., 18 months times 125,000 jobs per month) just to keep up with population growth.
In June, the number of workers officially unemployed increased 218,000, while the number of workers effectively unemployed actually decreased 35,000.
It's important to see the entire picture of America's jobs profile -- no matter how unpleasant.
I recognize that credit bubble related recoveries are hard to work out and are usually quite slow -- with job growth at the back end. This all makes sense -- but with Christina Romer out raising expectations again with giddy talk predicting a V-shaped recovery and given the "jobs, jobs, jobs" mantra of President Obama himself -- the gap between the job figures expected and the disappointing economic realities generated may be politically consequential.
-- Steve Clemons directs the American Strategy Program and Smart Globalization Initiative at the New America Foundation and publishes the popular political blog, The Washington Note
说明“人往高处走“
[snapback]2946858[/snapback]
麻烦你拿出“美国统计失业人口把农民都算进去”的证据。然后好好看看这篇文章。
America's Effective Unemployment Rate at 18.7%?
By Steve Clemons - July 2, 2009, 9:55AM
Each month, I receive from Leo Hindery an update on "America's effective unemployment rate" which includes not only the official unemployment figures but other data points showing off-the-books unemployed or underemployed people.
The numbers are staggering and are aggregates of official data. They matter because various Obama administration officials including the President himself started off calling for huge stimulus packages to help generate "jobs, jobs, jobs!"
But now, I have been hearing more and more from senior Obama economic team members about the jobs they hoped for coming at the very tail end of an economic recovery. Others are talking about a GDP recovery -- but not a jobs recovery. They are admitting as well that they underestimated the severity of this recession and its impact on unemployment levels.
And all this while Goldman Sachs and other financial houses have seen their balance sheets get cleaned up and bonuses surge.
Hindery writes:
Here is a June 2009 version of the summary that calculates the Effective Unemployment Rate, which is now 18.70%, and the Effective Number of Unemployed, which is now 30,172,000.
There are currently 14,729,000 officially unemployed workers, as just announced. However, this figure does not include the combined 15,443,000 workers either (1) in the "labor force reserve" because they have abandoned their job searches (i.e., 4,278,000) or (2) underemployed because they are "part-time of necessity" (i.e., 8,989,000) or "otherwise marginally attached" (i.e., 2,176,000).
The effective unemployment rate is therefore 18.70%, instead of the official 9.51%.
Since the start of the recession in December 2007, the number of workers who are officially unemployed has increased by 7,188,000, while almost twice as many workers - 13,290,000 - have become effectively unemployed. And all the while, we should have been creating around 2,250,000 new jobs (i.e., 18 months times 125,000 jobs per month) just to keep up with population growth.
In June, the number of workers officially unemployed increased 218,000, while the number of workers effectively unemployed actually decreased 35,000.
It's important to see the entire picture of America's jobs profile -- no matter how unpleasant.
I recognize that credit bubble related recoveries are hard to work out and are usually quite slow -- with job growth at the back end. This all makes sense -- but with Christina Romer out raising expectations again with giddy talk predicting a V-shaped recovery and given the "jobs, jobs, jobs" mantra of President Obama himself -- the gap between the job figures expected and the disappointing economic realities generated may be politically consequential.
-- Steve Clemons directs the American Strategy Program and Smart Globalization Initiative at the New America Foundation and publishes the popular political blog, The Washington Note
